Babylon Tries To Restrict Pakistan’s Nukes

Pakistan_nuclear 
US tried to put restrictions on Pakistan’s nuclear program: Aziz

By Web Desk
June 20, 2016 00:28

ISLAMABAD: Adviser to the Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz on Sunday said United States had tried to put restrictions on Pakistan’s nuclear program as Pakistan-US ties were marred by troubles at the time the incumbent government took charge three years back, ARY News reported.
“Drastic changes took place in the world politics after 9/11. Some countries made alliance on anti-Islam ideologies,” he said.

However during tenure of the current government relations between Pakistan and United States had got better, he said while giving interview to a state television channel. He said Pakistan had rejected US pressure on the country’s nuclear programme.

The advisor on foreign affairs said US intervention in Pakistan’s internal affairs had damaged bilateral relations, but the present government has revived strategic dialogue with US and urged US to cooperate with Pakistan on all levels.

He said verbal and gestural understandings were given to US authorities on drone strikes in former president Musharraf and Pakistan People’s Party’s tenures.

“The current PML-N government has taken a strong stance and gradually such strikes have decreased in frequency. Around 117 drone strikes were carried out in 2013 which has reduced to three in the following year,” he claimed.

Aziz also said most of the groups fighting in Afghanistan were fighting from within Afghanistan, but the perception persisted that Pakistan should take action against them.

“We can only bring Taliban to the negotiating table using our influence, but ultimately Afghanistan has to talk with them,” he said.

To a query, he said that Pakistan had not breached any agreement by constructing a gate on the Torkham border.

Sartaj Aziz said the gate was being constructed in 35km inside Pakistan’s territory from the border, hence, no one has the right of objection to this.

He said the ruling government has decided not to compromise on its integrity. He also said special security division had been established for China Pakistan Economic Corridor.

The Opposing Horns Of US And Pakistan

goamerica 
Pak-US trust deficit

Sajjad Shaukat

Trust deficit has deepened between Pakistan and the US since May 21, 2016, when the CIA-operated drone strike killed the Chief of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Akhtar Mansour in Nushki, Balochistan. On June 10, this year, a high-level delegation of the US visited Islamabad and met Pakistan’s Chief of the Army Staff Gen. Raheel Sharif and Adviser to the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz Adviser separately.

During the meeting, expressing his serious concern on the US drone strike in Balochistan as a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty, Chief of Army Staff, Gen. Raheel Sharif highlighted as to how it had impacted the mutual trust and was counterproductive in consolidating the gains of Operation Zarb-e-Azb. Gen. Raheel Sharif by elaborated, “All stakeholders need to understand Pakistan’s challenges…inter-tribal linkages and decades-old presence of over three million refugees…blaming Pakistan for instability in Afghanistan is unfortunate…target TTP and Mullah Fazlullah in their bases in Afghanistan…RAW and NDS are of fomenting terrorism…Pakistan is committed to work for a long term peace process for Afghanistan under Quadrilateral Coordination Group framework.”
However, America’s open double standards in relation to India and Pakistan and secret double game with the latter have created unbridgeable trust deficit between Pakistan and the US. The US has always preferred New Delhi over Islamabad. In this context, during the recent visit of the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to America, addressing the media jointly, Prime Modi said, “I am thankful for the help and support that my friend Barack Obama has extended with regard to India’s membership of the Missile Technology Control Regime and Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).”
America has been backing Indian hegemony in Asia to counterbalance China. During President Obama’s second visit to India, the US and India announced a breakthrough on a pact which would allow American companies to supply New Delhi with civilian nuclear technology, as agreed upon in 2008. This duplicity has initiated a dangerous arms race between Pakistan and India, and between China and India.

Setting aside the Indian irresponsible record of non-proliferation, and safety of nuclear arms, Washington also pressurized the International Atomic Agency (IAEA) to sign an accord of specific safeguards with India. America had already contacted the NSG to grant a waiver to India for starting civil nuclear trade on larger scale. Undoubtedly, unlike India, Pakistan’s nuclear assets are in safe hands—well-protected and are under tight security arrangements, having the best command and control system. However, taking cognizance of the US double standard, China and some responsible countries have decided to oppose in the meeting of the NSG to grant a waiver to India in this regard.
Nevertheless, after the latest incident of drone attack in Balochistan, Afghan Taliban leaders refused to participate in the US-sponsored talks with the Afghan government. Notably, in the recent past, with the help of Pakistan, a series of meetings were held in Islamabad and Kabul among the representatives of Pakistan, Afghanistan, China and the US to develop an understanding for the earliest possible resumption of stalled talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban with view to ending nearly 15 years of bloodshed in Afghanistan.

It is mentionable that on January 13, 2015, at least seven personnel of the Afghan security forces died during the suicide attack which targeted the Pakistani consulate in Jalalabad. The Islamic State group (ISIS or ISIL) claimed responsibility for the terror assault which coincided with efforts to restart the suspended peace process with the Taliban. Indian secret agency RAW was behind this terror attack to thwart these peace talks. Indian desperation in Afghanistan is increasing in the backdrop of growing engagements of Islamabad, Kabul, Beijing and Washington. Therefore, by arranging terror-assaults in Pakistan and Afghanistan, New Delhi is also sabotaging the peace process between the Afghan officials and representatives of Tehreek-e-Taliban Afghanistan.

It is noteworthy that America is playing double game with Pakistan, because it is the only nuclear country in the Islamic World, which irritates America, India and Israel. Hence, American CIA, Israeli Mossad and RAW which are well-penetrated in the ISIS, the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are using the militants of these terrorist outfits to destabilize Tibetan regions of China, Iranian Sistan-Baluchistan and Pakistan’s province of Balochistan by arranging the subversive activities. In this connection, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is their special target. Collectively or individually, these intelligence agencies are also assisting Jundullah (God’s soldiers)—the Sunni militant group which is active in Balochistan against Shias.

Based in the Afghan provinces of Kunar and Nuristan, Mullah Fazlullah, chief of the TTP is running a parallel government in Afghanistan. The militants of this outfit have their own legal system and own authority, exercising strict control. In the recent years, when the US-led NATO forces felt that they were failing in coping with the stiff resistance of the Taliban in Afghanistan, the high officials and media of their countries started accusing Pakistan’s army and country’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of supporting the Afghan Taliban in order to pacify their public for the protracted war in that country, which still continues. India avail the opportunity and also accused Islamabad of cross-border terrorism in Afghanistan.

It is notable that Pakistan’s Armed Forces broke the backbone of the militants through military operation Zarb-i-Azb—killing thousands of insurgents including foreign terrorists, while, ISI and other law-enforcing agencies captured several terrorists in various regions of Pakistan. Taking note of the ground realities, the US and other Western countries have begun appreciating the capabilities of Pakistan Army and other security agencies. Nonetheless, the strikes by the drones which have continued in Pakistan’s tribal areas since 2004 have intensified during the Obama era, and are clear violation of international laws. Collateral damage caused by these strikes also ignites violent and retaliatory sentiment among victims and perpetuate extremist wave. We can conclude that the double standards and double game of the US-led entities have created unbridgeable trust deficit between Pakistan and the US.

—The writer is freelance columnist based in Lahore.

Obama’s Betrayal Of Pakistan (Ezekiel 17)

Killing bin Laden May Have Harmed U.S. National Security

Killing a neutered bin Laden was little more than a publicity stunt. Pictured: Osama bin Laden in his happy cave days. (Photo: The Telegraph)

We recently posted about Seymour Hersh’s skepticism that the Pakistani military and the ISI were unaware of Osama bin Laden’s presence in Abbottabad. In his Democracy Now interview, he talks about how then-Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who was unenthusiastic about the mission, was especially upset that the Obama administration went public with the story almost immediately.
Initially, says Hersh, we “were going to announce it happened in the Hindu Kush and pretend that we did a strike with a drone.” The reason for that was to avoid exposing Army Chief of Staff Ashfaq Kayani Kayani and ISI Director General Ahmad Pasha’s knowledge of the mission and to spare them the embarrassment of the actual raid on their watch. Also, continues Hersh,

“We put so much effort into the two leaders to make them trust us, because of the bomb issue, and also because of what they do for us, constantly do for us, still in Pakistan.”

By “bomb issue,” Hersh means that the United States wants command it can trust in charge of Pakistan’s nuclear-weapons program. Elaborating, Hersh says,

“Gates … had a very critical thing to say about the White House, about going public so early. And he said it’s because they named the SEALs.”

But, “That wasn’t what his concern was.”

“His concern is we violated an agreement we made with Paha and Kayani to protect them. And the agreement we made with Pasha and Kayani to protect them. And the agreement was we wouldn’t let it be know what he was there, that the ISI was protecting him. They didn’t want the public to know it.”

While many believe that the raid on Abbottabad and the killing of bin Laden was a boon to U.S. national security, in the long run, it may have actually been to its detriment. Alienating those in the Pakistani command structure that are sympathetic to the United States may come back to bite us one day.